Tammy Baldwin

Where the money came from

Everything Baldwin’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

Money bundled through organizations

Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Baldwin, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.

• JStreetPAC$530,000
• EMILY's ListA group that works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, and one of the oldest donation bundlers in politics.$406,000

We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

• Corporation27%$813,000
• Trade association13%$377,000
• Labor union12%$367,000
• Membership organization13%$387,000
• Co-operative<1%$14,000
• Corporation without capital stock1%$39,000
• Unclassified33%$964,000

Which industries

• Agriculture & food53% · $14,000
• Other47% · $13,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

1. 1J StreetOther · Membership organizationThe PAC of J Street, a liberal pro-Israel group that supports a negotiated two-state solution. It bundles donations for candidates who share that position.$138,000
2. 2Schiff(T) the SenateOther · Unclassified$69,000
3. 3Fab Four for SenateOther · Unclassified$26,000
4. 4Reproductive Freedom for All PACOther · Membership organization$18,000
5. 5National Education AssociationLabor · Labor unionThe largest teachers' union in the United States.$18,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Baldwin has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Baldwin. It was spent on advertising about Baldwin, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.