Back to the library

Funding profile

Susie Lee

Democrat · Representative for Nevada’s 3rd district

Career totals · 6 elections · 20162026

$28.3 million

raised by Lee’s campaigns, everything from 2016 to 2026 added together.

24%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $6.7 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.

$2.8 million

was spent about Lee by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Lee on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Lee’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$28.3 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.66%$18.7 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.22%$6.4 million
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.12%$3.3 million
Federal Election Commission filings across 6 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Money bundled through organizations

Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Lee, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.

$358,000

reached Lee this way, 2% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.

  • EMILY's ListA group that works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, and one of the oldest donation bundlers in politics.$358,000
  • AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$250

We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation27%$685,000
  • Trade association9%$224,000
  • Labor union10%$258,000
  • Membership organization8%$194,000
  • Co-operative1%$20,000
  • Corporation without capital stock<1%$8,400
  • Unclassified44%$1.1 million

Which industries

  • Banking & finance50% · $45,000
  • Agriculture & food28% · $25,000
  • Retail & consumer22% · $20,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

  1. 1Credit Union National Association, Inc.Banking & finance · Trade associationThe trade association for credit unions.$25,000
  2. 2Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of AmericaAgriculture & food · Trade association$25,000
  3. 3Women VoteOther · UnclassifiedEMILY's List's super PAC, spending independently to support Democratic women who back abortion rights.$21,000
  4. 4Zinc Collective PACOther · Unclassified$21,000
  5. 5UBS Americas Inc.Banking & finance · CorporationThe financial firm's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$20,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6HoyerOther · Unclassified$20,000
  2. 7JeffriesOther · Unclassified$20,000
  3. 8American Association for Justice (Aaj)Legal & lobbying · Membership organization$20,000
  4. 9International Union of Operating Engineers Local 965 PefOther · Labor union$20,000
  5. 10ClarkOther · Unclassified$20,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Their money and their votes, side by side

For each industry that gave to Lee: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.

This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Lee voted; the judgment is yours.

Banking & finance$45,000 given

Lee voted on 26 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 33On PassageTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide special rules for the taxation of certain residents of Taiwan with income from sources within the United States.Yes
  • H R 736On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassProtect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025 This bill extends the deadline for certain companies that are required to file beneficial ownership information with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).Yes
  • H J RES 25On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies requirements for persons effectuating decentralized financial (DeFi) transactions to report certain information regarding digital asset sales to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 517On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedFiling Relief for Natural Disasters Act This act authorizes the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to postpone federal tax deadlines for taxpayers affected by a qualified state declared disaster, upon written request by the state governor.Yes
  • H R 997On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedNational Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025 This bill authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint legal counsel within the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) to report directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate.Yes
  • H R 1491On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedDisaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act This act requires the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to treat the postponement of the federal tax return deadline due to a federally declared disaster or certain other events as an extension of such deadline for purposes of calculating the limit on a tax refund.Yes
  • S J RES 28On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) titled Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications and published on December 10, 2024.No
  • S J RES 18On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau titled Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions and published on December 30, 2024.No

Agriculture & food$25,000 given

Lee voted on 8 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 2683On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill broadens the scope of the U.S. export control system to include remote access of items.Yes
  • H R 6500On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill extends through December 31, 2028, trade preferences that provide duty-free access to the U.S. market for most exports from eligible countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).Yes
  • H R 6504On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill extends through December 31, 2028, the special duty-free rules for various apparel products imported from Haiti, including the duty-free treatment provided for a limited amount (referred to as tariff preference levels) of certain apparel products assembled in and imported from Haiti.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 1326On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassDOE and USDA Interagency Research Act This bill requires the Department of Energy and Department of Agriculture to carry out cross-cutting and collaborative research and development activities through the establishment of an interagency agreement.Yes
  • H R 1011On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill revises the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) and the Emergency Forest Restoration Program (EFRP) to expand eligibility for payments to agricultural producers and owners of forest land impacted by natural disasters.Yes
  • H R 7567On PassageThis bill (commonly known as the farm bill) reauthorizes through FY2031 and modifies Department of Agriculture programs that address commodity support, conservation, trade and international food aid, nutrition assistance, farm credit, rural development, research and extension activities, forestry,…No
  • H R 2071On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill prohibits federal funds from being made available to international financial institutions (e.g., the International Monetary Fund) for financing activities related to foreign shrimp farms.Yes
  • S 629On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis act revises the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) and the Emergency Forest Restoration Program (EFRP) to expand eligibility for payments to agricultural producers and owners of forest land impacted by natural disasters.Yes

We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Lee has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Lee. It was spent on advertising about Lee, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

$2.8 million

has been spent for or against Lee by outside groups. $147,000 supported Lee; $2.6 million opposed Lee.

Largest outside spenders

Summed across 2 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.

Spent supporting

$145,000

Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.

  • FOR OUR FUTURE$79,000
  • MIDDLE CLASS VALUES PAC$26,000
  • SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION POLITICAL EDUCATION AND ACTION FUND$23,000
  • WIN JUSTICE$14,000
Show all 6 groupsShow fewer
  • AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO$1,450
  • JDCA PAC$878

Spent opposing

$2.6 million

Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.

  • CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND$2.6 million
  • AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC.(AFP ACTION)The political network founded by the Koch family, which backs candidates favoring lower taxes and less regulation.$5,000

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$4.4 million$1.3 million 30%none
2024$6.1 million$1.5 million 24%none
2022$6.3 million$1.5 million 23%none
2020$4.8 million$1.3 million 27%$2.7 million
2018$5.1 million$819,000 16%none
2016$1.7 million$22,000 1%$26,000

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.