Back to the library

Funding profile

Stacey E. Plaskett

Democrat · Delegate for the Virgin Islands

Career totals · 8 elections · 20122026

$3.9 million

raised by Plaskett’s campaigns, everything from 2012 to 2026 added together.

41%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $1.6 million from PACs.

$0

in outside spending on file. No group reported spending money on ads for or against Plaskett.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Plaskett on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Plaskett’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$3.9 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.59%$2.3 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.41%$1.6 million
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.1%$25,000
Federal Election Commission filings across 8 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation38%$255,000
  • Trade association26%$173,000
  • Labor union10%$69,000
  • Membership organization5%$32,000
  • Corporation without capital stock2%$13,000
  • Unclassified20%$135,000

Which industries

  • Retail & consumer15% · $23,000
  • Insurance14% · $21,000
  • Real estate & construction14% · $20,000
  • Legal & lobbying11% · $16,000
  • Health & pharmaceuticals10% · $15,000
  • Energy & utilities9% · $14,000
  • Agriculture & food7% · $10,000
  • Transport7% · $10,000
  • Other14% · $20,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

  1. 1National Multifamily Housing CouncilReal estate & construction · Trade associationA trade association for the apartment industry.$20,000
  2. 2International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation WorkersOther · Labor union$19,000
  3. 3Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee ILegal & lobbying · CorporationThe accounting firm PwC's political action committee, funded by employee contributions.$16,000
  4. 4AbbvieHealth & pharmaceuticals · Corporation$15,000
  5. 5International Association of Machinists and Aerospace WorkersOther · Labor union$15,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (Nreca)Energy & utilities · Trade association$14,000
  2. 7The Home Depot Inc.Retail & consumer · Corporation$13,000
  3. 8Pro-Choice WomenOther · Unclassified$11,000
  4. 9American Council of Life InsurersInsurance · Trade association$11,000
  5. 10Prudential Financial, Inc.Insurance · Corporation$10,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$713,000$279,000 39%none
2024$681,000$335,000 49%none
2022$973,000$326,000 33%none
2020$443,000$276,000 62%none
2018$360,000$212,000 59%none
2016$363,000$153,000 42%none
2014$286,000$1,000 <1%none
2012$66,000$0 0%none

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.