Back to the library

Funding profile

Shelley Moore Capito

Republican · Senator from West Virginia

Career totals · 3 elections · 20142026

$21.7 million

raised by Capito’s campaigns, everything from 2014 to 2026 added together.

38%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $8.3 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.

$895,000

was spent about Capito by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Capito on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Capito’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$21.7 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.49%$10.7 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.36%$7.9 million
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.15%$3.2 million
Federal Election Commission filings across 3 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Money bundled through organizations

Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Capito, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.

$413,000

reached Capito this way, 4% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.

  • AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$387,000
  • NORPACA New Jersey-based pro-Israel PAC that bundles member donations for candidates of both parties.$26,000

We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation50%$1.4 million
  • Trade association21%$587,000
  • Labor union2%$45,000
  • Membership organization4%$124,000
  • Co-operative1%$23,000
  • Corporation without capital stock1%$21,000
  • Unclassified22%$601,000

Which industries

  • Health & pharmaceuticals23% · $26,000
  • Manufacturing22% · $25,000
  • Real estate & construction18% · $21,000
  • Energy & utilities9% · $10,000
  • Banking & finance9% · $10,000
  • Other18% · $21,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

  1. 1Young Victory CommitteeOther · Unclassified$72,000
  2. 2ScottOther · Unclassified$20,000
  3. 3American Forest & Paper Association Political Action CommitteeManufacturing · Trade association$14,000
  4. 4Johnson & Johnson Political Action CommitteeHealth & pharmaceuticals · Corporation$13,000
  5. 5Heartland Values PACOther · Unclassified$13,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6American Association of OrthodontistsHealth & pharmaceuticals · Trade association$13,000
  2. 7American College of Ob-Gyns PAC (Ob-Gyn PAC)Other · Membership organization$12,000
  3. 8Nucor CorporationManufacturing · Corporation$11,000
  4. 9Crh Americas, Inc.Real estate & construction · Corporation$11,000
  5. 10Plains All American Gp LLC PACOther · Corporation$11,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Capito has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Capito. It was spent on advertising about Capito, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

$895,000

has been spent for or against Capito by outside groups. $667,000 supported Capito; $228,000 opposed Capito.

Largest outside spenders

Summed across 3 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.

Spent supporting

$659,000

Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.

  • TAKE ME HOME WV ACTION$338,000
  • US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$200,000
  • DEFENDING MAIN STREET SUPERPAC INC$49,000
  • NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND$48,000
Show all 7 groupsShow fewer
  • SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL PAC (SCI-PAC)$10,000
  • CLEARPATH ACTION FUND, INC.$9,900
  • NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND$4,077

Spent opposing

$227,000

Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.

  • SENATE MAJORITY PAC$227,000

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$6.5 million$2.8 million 43%$338,000
2020$5.8 million$2.7 million 47%$14,000
2014$9.5 million$2.4 million 25%$544,000

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.