Funding profile
Ryan Mackenzie
Republican · Representative for Pennsylvania’s 7th district
Career totals · 3 elections · 2018–2026
$6.4 million
raised by Mackenzie’s campaigns, everything from 2018 to 2026 added together.
24%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $1.5 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$11.3 million
was spent about Mackenzie by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Mackenzie on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Mackenzie’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.40%$2.6 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.23%$1.5 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.36%$2.3 million
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Mackenzie, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$42,000
reached Mackenzie this way, 2% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$38,000
- Senate Conservatives FundA PAC founded by former senator Jim DeMint that bundles donations for conservative Senate candidates, often in Republican primaries.$3,500
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation15%$206,000
- Trade association12%$166,000
- Labor union1%$16,000
- Membership organization7%$100,000
- Co-operative<1%$4,500
- Corporation without capital stock1%$13,000
- Unclassified63%$847,000
Which industries
- Real estate & construction42% · $20,000
- Energy & utilities32% · $15,000
- Other26% · $13,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1Scalise Leadership Fund$26,000
- 2Cole Combined CommitteeA joint fundraising committee raising for Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma and allied committees.$24,000
- 3Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Political Action Committee (Abc PAC)$20,000
- 4American Revival PAC$20,000
- 5Emmer Victory Committee$19,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Team Hill$19,000
- 7Republican Jewish Coalition$18,000
- 8Rvfpac$17,000
- 9Buckeye Victory Fund$16,000
- 10Commander Zinke$15,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Their money and their votes, side by side
For each industry that gave to Mackenzie: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.
This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Mackenzie voted; the judgment is yours.
Energy & utilities—$15,000 given
Mackenzie voted on 45 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 5184On Passageor the Affordable HOMES Act This bill rescinds Department of Energy (DOE) energy efficiency regulations applicable to manufactured housing and eliminates DOE’s authority to issue similar regulations.Yes
- H R 4593On PassageSaving Homeowners from Overregulation With Exceptional Rinsing Act or the SHOWER Act This bill provides statutory authority for a revised definition of showerhead for the purpose of federal water efficiency regulations.Yes
- H R 375On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassContinued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025 This bill establishes requirements to research and control Rapid Ohia Death, which is the disease caused by the fungal pathogen known as Ceratocystis fimbriata that affects the tree of the species Metrosideros polymorpha .Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 26On PassageProtecting American Energy Production Act This bill prohibits the President from declaring a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing unless Congress authorizes the moratorium.Yes
- H J RES 35On PassageThis joint resolution eliminates an annual waste emissions charge on oil or gas facilities under the Methane Emissions Reduction Program.Yes
- H J RES 20On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the rule titled Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters and submitted by the Department of Energy (DOE) on December 26, 2024.Yes
- H R 4090On PassageThis bill directs the Department of the Interior to address mineral supply chain vulnerabilities, including by accelerating and expanding mineral production on federal land (i.e., National Forest System land, public lands, and any land that may be leased for the exploration, development, or production of hardrock minerals).Yes
- H J RES 61On PassageThis joint resolution removes emission regulations on hazardous air pollutants under the rubber tire manufacturing source category, specifically from the rubber processing subcategory.Yes
We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Mackenzie has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Mackenzie. It was spent on advertising about Mackenzie, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$11.3 million
has been spent for or against Mackenzie by outside groups. That is roughly 2 times what the campaigns themselves raised. $1.3 million supported Mackenzie; $10 million opposed Mackenzie.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 2 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$1.2 millionAds urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTIONThe political network founded by the Koch family, which backs candidates favoring lower taxes and less regulation.$987,000
- CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND$231,000
Spent opposing
$9.6 millionAds urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- HMP$6.8 million
- DCCCThe Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the House Democrats' official campaign organization.$1.1 million
- PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY 2024$674,000
- VPP$461,000
Show all 6 groupsShow fewer
- LCV VICTORY FUND$355,000
- WOMEN VOTEEMILY's List's super PAC, spending independently to support Democratic women who back abortion rights.$187,000
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $4.4 million | $1 million 24% | $12,000 | FEC |
| 2024 | $1.8 million | $419,000 23% | $11.3 million | FEC |
| 2018 | $267,000 | $34,000 13% | none | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.