Funding profile
Mike Lee
Republican · Senator from Utah
Career totals · 4 elections · 2010–2028
$28.1 million
raised by Lee’s campaigns, everything from 2010 to 2028 added together.
17%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $4.7 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$11.2 million
was spent about Lee by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Lee on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Lee’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.77%$21.7 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.15%$4.3 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.7%$2 million
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Lee, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$404,000
reached Lee this way, 2% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- Senate Conservatives FundA PAC founded by former senator Jim DeMint that bundles donations for conservative Senate candidates, often in Republican primaries.$356,000
- NORPACA New Jersey-based pro-Israel PAC that bundles member donations for candidates of both parties.$43,000
- SBA Pro-Life AmericaThe candidate fund of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, which backs candidates who oppose abortion.$5,800
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation66%$232,000
- Trade association16%$57,000
- Membership organization2%$7,000
- Co-operative1%$2,500
- Corporation without capital stock<1%$1,000
- Unclassified14%$51,000
Which industries
- Energy & utilities34% · $40,000
- Transport9% · $10,000
- Technology & telecoms6% · $7,500
- Other51% · $60,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1American Electric Power$19,000
- 2Framatome Inc.$11,000
- 3Chevron Corporation$10,000
- 4Enterprise Holdings, Inc.$10,000
- 5Zillow Group, Inc. Political Action Committee (Zg PAC)$10,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Ryan LLC Political Action Committee (Ryanpac)$10,000
- 7American Resort Development Association$10,000
- 8Peabody Energy Corporation$9,000
- 9Charter Communications Inc.$7,500
- 10American Petroleum Institute Political Action Committee (Api PAC)$6,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Lee has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Lee. It was spent on advertising about Lee, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$11.2 million
has been spent for or against Lee by outside groups. $6.6 million supported Lee; $4.6 million opposed Lee.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 4 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$6.1 millionAds urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- LIBERTY CHAMPIONS$1.6 million
- CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTIONA conservative group focused on lower taxes and smaller government. It is known for backing primary challengers against Republicans it considers insufficiently conservative.$1.6 million
- AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTIONThe political network founded by the Koch family, which backs candidates favoring lower taxes and less regulation.$1.2 million
- PROTECT FREEDOM POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$677,000
Show all 7 groupsShow fewer
- SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUNDA PAC founded by former senator Jim DeMint that bundles donations for conservative Senate candidates, often in Republican primaries.$602,000
- CRYPTO FREEDOM PAC$207,000
- Committee not named in the filing$106,000
Spent opposing
$4.6 millionAds urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- PUT UTAH FIRST PAC$4.6 million
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2028in progress | $7.4 million | $315,000 4% | $106,000 | FEC |
| 2022 | $12.7 million | $2.2 million 17% | $10.7 million | FEC |
| 2016 | $6.1 million | $1.4 million 23% | $332,000 | FEC |
| 2010 | $1.8 million | $438,000 24% | $135,000 | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.