Funding profile
Martin Heinrich
Democrat · Senator from New Mexico
Career totals · 4 elections · 2012–2030
$30 million
raised by Heinrich’s campaigns, everything from 2012 to 2030 added together.
24%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $7.2 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$3.5 million
was spent about Heinrich by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Heinrich on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Heinrich’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.71%$21.4 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.24%$7.1 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.5%$1.5 million
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Heinrich, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$127,000
reached Heinrich this way, 1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- JStreetPAC$127,000
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation48%$1.2 million
- Trade association15%$382,000
- Labor union7%$179,000
- Membership organization6%$152,000
- Co-operative1%$21,000
- Corporation without capital stock1%$19,000
- Unclassified22%$537,000
Which industries
- Defense & aerospace18% · $35,000
- Energy & utilities15% · $29,000
- Banking & finance10% · $20,000
- Transport7% · $14,000
- Health & pharmaceuticals7% · $14,000
- Technology & telecoms7% · $14,000
- Real estate & construction7% · $13,000
- Other30% · $58,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1Applied Research Associates, Inc. Political Action Committee (Arapac)$20,000
- 2Credit Union National Association, Inc.The trade association for credit unions.$20,000
- 3American Petroleum Institute Political Action Committee (Api PAC)$16,000
- 4Pattern Energy Group Inc$15,000
- 5General Atomics$15,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Carrier Global Corporation Political Action Committee$15,000
- 7Sempra Energy Employees Political Action Committee- Federal$15,000
- 8Holland & Knight Committee for Effective Government$14,000
- 9National Marine Manufacturers Association$14,000
- 10Abbvie$14,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Heinrich has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Heinrich. It was spent on advertising about Heinrich, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$3.5 million
has been spent for or against Heinrich by outside groups. $510,000 supported Heinrich; $2.9 million opposed Heinrich.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 3 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$351,000Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ACTION FUND$254,000
- CITIZENS FOR STRENGTH AND SECURITY PAC$49,000
- AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$48,000
Spent opposing
$2.9 millionAds urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$1.6 million
- CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES$658,000
- JEFFERSON RISING$532,000
- AMERICAN FREEDOM PAC (AFPAC)$82,000
Show all 5 groupsShow fewer
- FRONTIERS OF FREEDOM ACTION, INC.$42,000
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2030in progress | $1.5 million | $443,000 30% | none | FEC |
| 2024 | $13.2 million | $2.8 million 21% | $726,000 | FEC |
| 2018 | $8.6 million | $2.7 million 31% | $7,583 | FEC |
| 2012 | $6.7 million | $1.2 million 17% | $2.7 million | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.