
Funding profile
Madeleine Dean
Democrat · Representative for Pennsylvania’s 4th district
Career totals · 5 elections · 2018–2026
$8.2 million
raised by Dean’s campaigns, everything from 2018 to 2026 added together.
48%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $4 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$437,000
was spent about Dean by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Dean on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Dean’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.48%$3.9 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.48%$3.9 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.5%$393,000
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Dean, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$57,000
reached Dean this way, 1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- JStreetPAC$50,000
- EMILY's ListA group that works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, and one of the oldest donation bundlers in politics.$6,375
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$500
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation40%$663,000
- Trade association17%$277,000
- Labor union21%$350,000
- Membership organization10%$161,000
- Co-operative1%$24,000
- Corporation without capital stock4%$63,000
- Unclassified8%$125,000
Which industries
- Health & pharmaceuticals26% · $20,000
- Transport26% · $19,000
- Real estate & construction23% · $18,000
- Other25% · $19,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1National Air Traffic Controllers Association$20,000
- 2Int'l Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers$20,000
- 3American Association for Justice (Aaj)$20,000
- 4Ernst & Young Political Action Committee$20,000
- 5American Institute of Certified Public Accountants$20,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio$20,000
- 7International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers$20,000
- 8United Steelworkers$20,000
- 9American Hospital Association$20,000
- 10Air Line Pilots Association$20,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Their money and their votes, side by side
For each industry that gave to Dean: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.
This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Dean voted; the judgment is yours.
Health & pharmaceuticals—$20,000 given
Dean voted on 5 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 2493On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill reauthorizes through FY2030 grant programs administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) that provide funding to health care service providers and related entities in rural areas.Yes
- H R 2483On PassageSUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025 This act reauthorizes and revises programs and activities relating to addressing substance use disorders, overdoses, and mental health.Yes
- H R 4541On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill reauthorizes and revises programs of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that support services and education addressing breast and cervical cancer.Yes
Show 2 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 6703On PassageLower Health Care Premiums for All Americans ActNo
- H R 498On PassageThis bill prohibits federal Medicaid payment for specified gender transition procedures for individuals under the age of 18. The bill defines these procedures to mean those that are intended to change the body of an individual to no longer correspond to the individual's biological sex (male or female), including specified surgeries, implants, and medications (e.g., hormones).No vote
Transport—$18,000 given
Dean voted on 8 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 192On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassAmtrak Executive Bonus Disclosure Act This bill requires Amtrak to publicly disclose the annual base pay and bonus compensation paid to an Amtrak executive in a required annual report to Congress.Yes
- S 2503On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassRotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight Reform Act or the ROTOR Act This bill addresses aviation safety by increasing requirements for aircraft tracking and communication using Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) technology and expanding oversight.Yes
- H R 7084On PassageThis bill authorizes the President to prohibit the entry of a vessel into the United States if the vessel has transited any U.S.No
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 7613On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedAirspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act of 2026 or the ALERT Act This bill addresses aviation safety by increasing requirements for aircraft tracking and communication using Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) technology and expanding oversight.Yes
- H R 2035On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassAmerican Cargo for American Ships Act This bill requires 100% of equipment, materials, and commodities procured, furnished, or financed by the Department of Transportation (DOT) and transported on ocean vessels to be transported on U.S.-flagged commercial vessels. (Current cargo preference laws require that a minimum percentage of federally financed ocean cargo be transported on U.S.-flagged commercial vessels.No vote
- H R 4275On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedCoast Guard Authorization Act of 2025Yes
- H R 8897On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedImproving Travel for American Families Act This bill directs the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to establish a pilot program to implement alternative security screenings for passengers traveling with children who are 12 years old and younger.Yes
- H R 1608On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to submit a report to Congress on the department's efforts to prevent, deter, and respond to vehicular terrorism (i.e., an action that utilizes automotive transportation to commit terrorism).Yes
We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Dean has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Dean. It was spent on advertising about Dean, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$437,000
has been spent for or against Dean by outside groups. $336,000 supported Dean; $101,000 opposed Dean.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 5 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$333,000Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- WOMEN VOTE!EMILY's List's super PAC, spending independently to support Democratic women who back abortion rights.$247,000
- AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PACThe trade association for hospitals and health systems.$32,000
- INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION$16,000
- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$13,000
Show all 7 groupsShow fewer
- COMMONWEALTH COMMUNICATIONS$11,000
- FOR OUR FUTURE$9,204
- DEMOCRATIC JEWISH OUTREACH PA$4,308
Spent opposing
$100,000Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- WE STAND FOR BETTER$100,000
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $1.4 million | $725,000 53% | $105 | FEC |
| 2024 | $1.8 million | $917,000 52% | $1,316 | FEC |
| 2022 | $2.1 million | $993,000 48% | $19,000 | FEC |
| 2020 | $1.6 million | $782,000 50% | $12,000 | FEC |
| 2018 | $1.4 million | $488,000 34% | $404,000 | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.