Back to the library

Funding profile

Lauren Boebert

Republican · Representative for Colorado’s 4th district

Career totals · 4 elections · 20202026

$16.7 million

raised by Boebert’s campaigns, everything from 2020 to 2026 added together.

4%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $661,000 from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.

$6.2 million

was spent about Boebert by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Boebert on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Boebert’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$16.7 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.86%$14.4 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.4%$654,000
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.10%$1.6 million
Federal Election Commission filings across 4 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Money bundled through organizations

Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Boebert, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.

$6,600

reached Boebert this way, <1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.

  • Senate Conservatives FundA PAC founded by former senator Jim DeMint that bundles donations for conservative Senate candidates, often in Republican primaries.$6,600

We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation1%$3,500
  • Trade association4%$20,000
  • Membership organization3%$16,000
  • Co-operative5%$26,000
  • Unclassified87%$421,000

Largest committee givers

  1. 1Freedom Caucus FundOther · Unclassified$40,000
  2. 2Team Boebert Joint Fundraising CommitteeOther · Unclassified$39,000
  3. 3Scalise Leadership FundOther · Unclassified$28,000
  4. 4Emmer Victory CommitteeOther · Unclassified$21,000
  5. 5WinredOther · Unclassified$14,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6American Crystal Sugar CompayAgriculture & food · Co-operative$13,000
  2. 7Buckeye Victory FundOther · Unclassified$11,000
  3. 8Cory Gardner for SenateOther · Unclassified$10,000
  4. 9Western Sugar CooperativeOther · Trade association$10,000
  5. 10American Revival PACOther · Unclassified$10,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Boebert has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Boebert. It was spent on advertising about Boebert, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

$6.2 million

has been spent for or against Boebert by outside groups. $1.3 million supported Boebert; $4.9 million opposed Boebert.

Largest outside spenders

Summed across 4 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.

Spent supporting

$852,000

Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.

  • HOUSE FREEDOM FUND$852,000

Spent opposing

$4.5 million

Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.

  • HOUSE MAJORITY PACA super PAC aligned with House Democratic leadership, spending to win or hold Democratic House seats.$1.4 million
  • DCCCThe Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the House Democrats' official campaign organization.$994,000
  • WOMEN VOTE!EMILY's List's super PAC, spending independently to support Democratic women who back abortion rights.$702,000
  • LCV VICTORY FUND$509,000
Show all 7 groupsShow fewer
  • COLORADO UNITED PAC$370,000
  • RURAL COLORADO UNITED$350,000
  • DEFEAT THE EXTREME FUND$228,000

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$1 million$131,000 13%$5,858
2024$4.8 million$256,000 5%$559,000
2022$7.9 million$109,000 1%$1.2 million
2020$3 million$159,000 5%$4.4 million

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.