Back to the library

Funding profile

Ken Calvert

Republican · Representative for California’s 41st district

Career totals · 19 elections · 19822026

$32.7 million

raised by Calvert’s campaigns, everything from 1982 to 2026 added together.

37%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $12 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.

$10.3 million

was spent about Calvert by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Calvert on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Calvert’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$32.7 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.53%$17.5 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.34%$11 million
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.13%$4.3 million
Federal Election Commission filings across 19 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Money bundled through organizations

Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Calvert, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.

$1 million

reached Calvert this way, 6% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.

  • AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$1 million

We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation40%$1.4 million
  • Trade association8%$288,000
  • Labor union1%$43,000
  • Membership organization5%$181,000
  • Co-operative<1%$13,000
  • Corporation without capital stock1%$28,000
  • Unclassified45%$1.6 million

Which industries

  • Defense & aerospace72% · $105,000
  • Other28% · $41,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

  1. 1American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action CommitteeOther · Membership organizationThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$75,000
  2. 2Cole Combined CommitteeOther · UnclassifiedA joint fundraising committee raising for Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma and allied committees.$35,000
  3. 3New Majority Federal PACOther · Membership organization$30,000
  4. 4Scalise Leadership FundOther · Unclassified$28,000
  5. 5Mike Rogers VictoryOther · Unclassified$25,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6Bae SystemsDefense & aerospace · Corporation$25,000
  2. 7Team HillOther · Unclassified$22,000
  3. 8Emmer Victory CommitteeOther · Unclassified$21,000
  4. 9Aerovironment, Inc PACOther · Corporation$21,000
  5. 10American Maritime OfficersOther · Labor union$20,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Their money and their votes, side by side

For each industry that gave to Calvert: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.

This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Calvert voted; the judgment is yours.

Defense & aerospace$125,000 given

Calvert voted on 21 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 980On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedModernizing the Veterans On-Campus Experience Act of 2025 This bill removes the requirement that educational and vocational counseling services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on campus at institutions of higher learning must be provided by VA counselors.Yes
  • H R 3123On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill establishes procedures for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to issue a pension that was due but unpaid at the time of a veteran’s death.Yes
  • H R 695On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedMedal of Honor Act This act increases the monthly special pension for living Medal of Honor recipients.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 586On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedVietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to conduct an epidemiological study and report on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer) in veterans who served in the Vietnam theater of operations during the Vietnam era.Yes
  • H R 1039On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedClear Communication for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess notices that the VA sends to claimants applying for or submitting claims for VA benefits.Yes
  • H R 1228On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassPrioritizing Veterans' Survivors Act This bill provides that the Office of Survivors Assistance (OSA) must operate within the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (Currently, OSA operates within the Pension and Fiduciary Service of the Veterans Benefits Administration.)Yes
  • H R 530On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedACES Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study and report on the prevalence and mortality of cancers among veterans who served on active duty as aircrew members and regularly flew in fixed-wing aircraft.Yes
  • H R 1286On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedSimplifying Forms for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess the forms that the VA sends to claimants.Yes

We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Calvert has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Calvert. It was spent on advertising about Calvert, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

$10.3 million

has been spent for or against Calvert by outside groups. $2.2 million supported Calvert; $8.1 million opposed Calvert.

Largest outside spenders

Summed across 7 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.

Spent supporting

$1.7 million

Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.

  • AMERICA PACA super PAC founded and largely funded by Elon Musk that supported Donald Trump in 2024.$944,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$726,000

Spent opposing

$7.1 million

Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.

  • HMP$4.8 million
  • CFF$574,000
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)$560,000
  • EDF ACTION VOTES$411,000
Show all 6 groupsShow fewer
  • LCV VICTORY FUND$410,000
  • TERM LIMITS ACTION$365,000

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$6.1 million$1.4 million 22%$669,000
2024$8.1 million$2.2 million 27%$8.6 million
2022$3.7 million$1.1 million 30%$423,000
2020$1.4 million$612,000 42%$864
2018$1.6 million$704,000 45%$6,322
2016$1.5 million$743,000 51%$20
2014$1.2 million$639,000 54%none
2012$1.1 million$504,000 46%none
2010$1.7 million$705,000 42%$609,000
2008$1 million$360,000 34%none
2006$919,000$353,000 38%none
2004$704,000$295,000 42%none
2002$638,000$243,000 38%none
2000$467,000$227,000 49%none
1998$761,000$296,000 39%none
1996$640,000$255,000 40%none
1994$782,000$260,000 33%none
1992$423,000$138,000 33%none
1982$26,000$0 0%none

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.