Back to the library

Funding profile

Katherine M. Clark

Democrat · Representative for Massachusetts’s 5th district

Career totals · 7 elections · 20142026

$18.5 million

raised by Clark’s campaigns, everything from 2014 to 2026 added together.

46%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $8.6 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.

$143,000

was spent about Clark by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Clark on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Clark’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$18.5 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.43%$7.9 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.42%$7.8 million
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.15%$2.9 million
Federal Election Commission filings across 7 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Money bundled through organizations

Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Clark, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.

$822,000

reached Clark this way, 11% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.

  • AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$680,000
  • JStreetPAC$141,000

We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation53%$2.3 million
  • Trade association18%$785,000
  • Labor union10%$413,000
  • Membership organization8%$338,000
  • Co-operative1%$26,000
  • Corporation without capital stock2%$79,000
  • Unclassified9%$363,000

Which industries

  • Technology & telecoms25% · $41,000
  • Health & pharmaceuticals25% · $40,000
  • Defense & aerospace13% · $21,000
  • Insurance12% · $20,000
  • Banking & finance12% · $20,000
  • Real estate & construction12% · $20,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

  1. 1American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action CommitteeOther · Membership organizationThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$34,000
  2. 2International Union of Operating Engineers Local 965 PefOther · Labor union$25,000
  3. 3National Restaurant AssociationAgriculture & food · Membership organization$23,000
  4. 4National Air Traffic Controllers AssociationOther · Labor union$23,000
  5. 5National Association of BroadcastersTechnology & telecoms · Trade association$21,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6General Dynamics CorporationDefense & aerospace · Corporation$21,000
  2. 7American Academy of Dermatology AssociationHealth & pharmaceuticals · Trade association$20,000
  3. 8Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyInsurance · Corporation$20,000
  4. 9CVS HealthHealth & pharmaceuticals · Corporation$20,000
  5. 10Council of Insurance Agents & BrokersOther · Membership organization$20,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Their money and their votes, side by side

For each industry that gave to Clark: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.

This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Clark voted; the judgment is yours.

Technology & telecoms$61,000 given

Clark voted on 12 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 901On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassResearch Security and Accountability in DHS Act This bill requires the Science and Technology Directorate in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to develop a department-wide policy for safeguarding research and development from unauthorized access or disclosures of sensitive information in related acquisitions.Yes
  • H R 1534On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassInnovative Mitigation Partnerships for Asphalt and Concrete Technologies Act or the IMPACT Act This bill requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish a temporary program that supports advanced production of low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt.Yes
  • S 146On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Passor the TAKE IT DOWN Act This act generally prohibits the nonconsensual online publication of intimate visual depictions of individuals, both authentic and computer-generated, and requires certain online platforms (e.g., social media platforms) to promptly remove such depictions upon receiving notice of their existence.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 1681On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill establishes an interagency strike force to support federal land management agencies' review of requests for communications use authorizations. (A communications use authorization is required to modify or locate communications facilities on public lands.) The strike force must (1) conduct periodic calls with strike force members to ensure that each agency prioritizes the review of requests for communications use authorizations, (2) establish goals for the review of the requests, and (3) monitor and facilitate agency accountability for meeting the established goals.Yes
  • H R 5200On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate and report on emergency communications outages (e.g., 9-1-1 outages).Yes
  • H R 5201On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish a report on the enforcement of Kari’s Law, which requires multiline telephone systems to be preconfigured to allow users to dial 9-1-1 directly from any phone without dialing any additional code or prefix.Yes
  • H R 1223On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassAccelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act or the ANCHOR Act This bill requires the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop a plan to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet (ARF). ARF is comprised of U.S.-flagged vessels that provide at-sea laboratories where oceanographic scientists, educators, and students research and learn about marine science.Yes
  • S 1003On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis act requires the Federal Communications Commission to issue an order explicitly permitting the transmission of wireless emergency alerts to mobile phones in the event of a shark attack. (Under current regulations, authorized government authorities are permitted to send wireless emergency…Yes

Health & pharmaceuticals$40,000 given

Clark voted on 5 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 2493On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill reauthorizes through FY2030 grant programs administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) that provide funding to health care service providers and related entities in rural areas.Yes
  • H R 2483On PassageSUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025 This act reauthorizes and revises programs and activities relating to addressing substance use disorders, overdoses, and mental health.Yes
  • H R 4541On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill reauthorizes and revises programs of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that support services and education addressing breast and cervical cancer.Yes
Show 2 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 6703On PassageLower Health Care Premiums for All Americans ActNo
  • H R 498On PassageThis bill prohibits federal Medicaid payment for specified gender transition procedures for individuals under the age of 18. The bill defines these procedures to mean those that are intended to change the body of an individual to no longer correspond to the individual's biological sex (male or female), including specified surgeries, implants, and medications (e.g., hormones).No

Defense & aerospace$21,000 given

Clark voted on 21 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 980On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedModernizing the Veterans On-Campus Experience Act of 2025 This bill removes the requirement that educational and vocational counseling services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on campus at institutions of higher learning must be provided by VA counselors.Yes
  • H R 3123On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill establishes procedures for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to issue a pension that was due but unpaid at the time of a veteran’s death.Yes
  • H R 695On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedMedal of Honor Act This act increases the monthly special pension for living Medal of Honor recipients.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 586On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedVietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to conduct an epidemiological study and report on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer) in veterans who served in the Vietnam theater of operations during the Vietnam era.Yes
  • H R 1039On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedClear Communication for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess notices that the VA sends to claimants applying for or submitting claims for VA benefits.Yes
  • H R 1228On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassPrioritizing Veterans' Survivors Act This bill provides that the Office of Survivors Assistance (OSA) must operate within the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (Currently, OSA operates within the Pension and Fiduciary Service of the Veterans Benefits Administration.)Yes
  • H R 530On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedACES Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study and report on the prevalence and mortality of cancers among veterans who served on active duty as aircrew members and regularly flew in fixed-wing aircraft.Yes
  • H R 1286On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedSimplifying Forms for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess the forms that the VA sends to claimants.Yes

Insurance$20,000 given

Clark voted on 19 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 736On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassProtect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025 This bill extends the deadline for certain companies that are required to file beneficial ownership information with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).Yes
  • S J RES 28On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) titled Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications and published on December 10, 2024.No
  • S J RES 18On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau titled Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions and published on December 30, 2024.No
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • S J RES 13On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency titled Business Combinations Under the Bank Merger Act and published on September 25, 2024.No
  • H R 3394On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedFair Investment Opportunities for Professional Experts Act This bill expands the eligibility criteria for an accredited investor for purposes of participating in private offerings of securities to include an individual determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to have qualifying professional knowledge through educational or professional experience. (Certain unregistered securities may only be offered to accredited investors.) The bill also provides statutory authority for certain existing criteria for an accredited investor, including licensure or registration in good standing as a broker or investment adviser, specified annual salary, and specified net worth.Yes
  • H R 3234On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill increases the amount insured depository institutions may accept as reciprocal deposits. (Reciprocal deposits are used by institutions to increase the availability of deposit insurance by splitting large deposits using a reciprocal network of institutions.) The bill creates a tiered system so that the allowable amount is based on the institution's total liabilities.Yes
  • H R 4544On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill requires federal financial regulators to review and streamline the application process for the formation of de novo, or new, depository institutions or credit unions.Yes
  • H R 5317On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill changes the treatment of certain types of deposits so they are no longer classified as brokered deposits.Yes

We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Clark has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Clark. It was spent on advertising about Clark, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

$143,000

has been spent for or against Clark by outside groups. $143,000 supported Clark; $0 opposed Clark.

Largest outside spenders

Summed across 7 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.

Spent supporting

$143,000

Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.

  • WOMEN VOTE!EMILY's List's super PAC, spending independently to support Democratic women who back abortion rights.$140,000
  • INDIVISIBLE ACTION$1,371
  • AFT SOLIDARITY$1,000
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES$69
Show all 8 groupsShow fewer
  • ENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC$59
  • SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION$40
  • SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE$40
  • FAIR SHARE ALLIANCE INC$29

Spent opposing

$0

Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.

Nothing on file.

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$4.5 million$1.8 million 41%$1,381
2024$5 million$2.3 million 46%$10
2022$2.2 million$1.2 million 56%$31
2020$1.8 million$843,000 46%$1,070
2018$1.5 million$614,000 41%$10
2016$1.3 million$545,000 41%$39
2014$2.2 million$432,000 19%$140,000

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.