Funding profile
Josh Harder
Democrat · Representative for California’s 9th district
Career totals · 5 elections · 2018–2026
$32.1 million
raised by Harder’s campaigns, everything from 2018 to 2026 added together.
11%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $3.5 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$8.2 million
was spent about Harder by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Harder on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Harder’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.84%$26.8 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.10%$3.2 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.6%$2.1 million
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Harder, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$364,000
reached Harder this way, 1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- JStreetPAC$264,000
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$101,000
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation<1%$4,000
- Trade association12%$138,000
- Labor union22%$248,000
- Membership organization12%$135,000
- Co-operative5%$63,000
- Unclassified49%$558,000
Largest committee givers
- 1International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers$25,000
- 2Hoyer$20,000
- 3Jeffries$20,000
- 4American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio$20,000
- 5American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio Committee on Political Education$20,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6American Crystal Sugar Compay$20,000
- 7Air Line Pilots Association$19,000
- 8Clark$18,000
- 9Defend Democracy Now PAC$17,000
- 10Aguilar$17,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Harder has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Harder. It was spent on advertising about Harder, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$8.2 million
has been spent for or against Harder by outside groups. $1 million supported Harder; $7.2 million opposed Harder.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 5 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$626,000Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- NEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE$146,000
- WE VOTE - NOSOTROS VOTAMOS - PPAMM COMMITTEE$131,000
- LCV VICTORY FUND$127,000
- DCCCThe Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the House Democrats' official campaign organization.$116,000
Show all 5 groupsShow fewer
- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$107,000
Spent opposing
$7 millionAds urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND$4.1 million
- NRCCThe National Republican Congressional Committee, the House Republicans' official campaign organization.$2.5 million
- DEFENDING MAIN STREET SUPERPAC INC.$466,000
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $4.1 million | $507,000 12% | $5,655 | FEC |
| 2024 | $5.4 million | $590,000 11% | $1 million | FEC |
| 2022 | $6.6 million | $856,000 13% | $51,000 | FEC |
| 2020 | $7.5 million | $867,000 11% | $73,000 | FEC |
| 2018 | $8.4 million | $350,000 4% | $7 million | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.