Funding profile
James C. Justice
Republican · Senator from West Virginia
Career totals · 2 elections · 2024–2030
$4.7 million
raised by Justice’s campaigns, everything from 2024 to 2030 added together.
16%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $753,000 from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$5.8 million
was spent about Justice by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Justice on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Justice’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.59%$2.8 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.16%$739,000
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.25%$1.2 million
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Justice, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$15,000
reached Justice this way, 1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$15,000
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation26%$266,000
- Trade association19%$194,000
- Labor union1%$7,500
- Membership organization5%$48,000
- Co-operative<1%$5,000
- Corporation without capital stock<1%$5,000
- Unclassified49%$506,000
Which industries
- Transport40% · $20,000
- Health & pharmaceuticals20% · $10,000
- Other40% · $20,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1Justice Victory Committee$154,000
- 2National Automobile Dealers AssociationThe trade association for car and truck dealerships.$20,000
- 3Winred$19,000
- 42024 Thune Republican Senate Victory$19,000
- 5American Hospital AssociationThe trade association for hospitals and health systems.$10,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Alliance for Physical Therapy Quality and Innovation Inc PAC$10,000
- 7Blackburn$10,000
- 8Capito$10,000
- 9Cory Gardner for Senate$10,000
- 10Mcconnell for Majority Leader Committee$10,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Justice has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Justice. It was spent on advertising about Justice, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$5.8 million
has been spent for or against Justice by outside groups. $3.7 million supported Justice; $2.1 million opposed Justice.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 1 election, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$3.7 millionAds urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- DEFEND AMERICAN JOBSA cryptocurrency-industry super PAC affiliated with Fairshake that spends in support of Republicans.$3 million
- TEAM WEST VIRGINIA$483,000
- CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS PAC$177,000
- MORE JOBS, LESS GOVERNMENT$26,000
Show all 6 groupsShow fewer
- NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND$3,869
- WEST VIRGINIANS FOR LIFE INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$212
Spent opposing
$2.1 millionAds urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTIONA conservative group focused on lower taxes and smaller government. It is known for backing primary challengers against Republicans it considers insufficiently conservative.$2.1 million
- CLUB FOR GROWTH PACA conservative group focused on lower taxes and smaller government. It is known for backing primary challengers against Republicans it considers insufficiently conservative.$359
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2030in progress | $80,000 | $34,000 43% | none | FEC |
| 2024 | $4.6 million | $704,000 15% | $5.8 million | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.