Funding profile
Jack Reed
Democrat · Senator from Rhode Island
Career totals · 6 elections · 1996–2026
$23.4 million
raised by Reed’s campaigns, everything from 1996 to 2026 added together.
41%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $9.6 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$4,264
was spent about Reed by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Reed on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Reed’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.54%$12.7 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.41%$9.5 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.5%$1.2 million
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Reed, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$142,000
reached Reed this way, 1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$80,000
- NORPACA New Jersey-based pro-Israel PAC that bundles member donations for candidates of both parties.$52,000
- JStreetPAC$11,000
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation36%$451,000
- Trade association10%$131,000
- Labor union13%$159,000
- Membership organization5%$59,000
- Corporation without capital stock1%$15,000
- Unclassified35%$441,000
Which industries
- Technology & telecoms50% · $30,000
- Defense & aerospace33% · $20,000
- Energy & utilities17% · $10,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1Van Hollen$10,000
- 2Charter Communications Inc.The cable and internet company's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$10,000
- 3Honeywell International Inc.The industrial and aerospace company's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$10,000
- 4Arkansas Rural Water Association Federal Political Action Committee$10,000
- 5Comcast CorporationThe cable and media company's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$10,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Blue Origin, LLC$10,000
- 7Votevets$10,000
- 8Northrop Grumman Corporation$10,000
- 9Ernst & Young Political Action Committee$10,000
- 10Kaine$10,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Reed has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Reed. It was spent on advertising about Reed, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$4,264
has been spent for or against Reed by outside groups. $148 supported Reed; $4,116 opposed Reed.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 3 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$148Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES$69
- ENVIRONMENT AMERICA INC$59
- SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION$10
- SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE$10
Spent opposing
$4,116Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- PATRIOT VOICES PAC$4,116
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $4.2 million | $1.4 million 33% | $19 | FEC |
| 2020 | $4 million | $1.9 million 46% | $60 | FEC |
| 2014 | $4 million | $1.9 million 49% | $4,185 | FEC |
| 2008 | $4.7 million | $1.8 million 39% | none | FEC |
| 2002 | $3.8 million | $1.5 million 39% | none | FEC |
| 1996 | $2.7 million | $1 million 38% | none | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.