Funding profile
Greg Landsman
Democrat · Representative for Ohio’s 1st district
Career totals · 3 elections · 2022–2026
$11.1 million
raised by Landsman’s campaigns, everything from 2022 to 2026 added together.
28%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $3.1 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$5.2 million
was spent about Landsman by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Landsman on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Landsman’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.71%$7.9 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.20%$2.3 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.9%$996,000
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Landsman, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$873,000
reached Landsman this way, 11% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$872,000
- GiveGreenA donation platform run by the League of Conservation Voters and NRDC Action Votes that directs money to candidates it rates strong on climate policy.$500
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation2%$44,000
- Trade association16%$315,000
- Labor union26%$505,000
- Membership organization10%$206,000
- Co-operative1%$28,000
- Corporation without capital stock<1%$2,000
- Unclassified44%$879,000
Which industries
- Real estate & construction100% · $20,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1Air Line Pilots Association$25,000
- 2American Association for Justice (Aaj)$25,000
- 3American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action CommitteeThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$23,000
- 4Clark$20,000
- 5Hoyer$20,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio$20,000
- 7International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$20,000
- 8Laborers' International Union of North America$20,000
- 9International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers$20,000
- 10American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio Committee on Political Education$20,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Landsman has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Landsman. It was spent on advertising about Landsman, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$5.2 million
has been spent for or against Landsman by outside groups. $867,000 supported Landsman; $4.3 million opposed Landsman.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 3 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$632,000Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN$283,000
- DCCCThe Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the House Democrats' official campaign organization.$167,000
- CLIMATE POWER ACTION$68,000
- WORKING AMERICA$59,000
Show all 5 groupsShow fewer
- TOGETHER FOR OHIO'S FUTURE PAC$56,000
Spent opposing
$4.3 millionAds urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND$2.3 million
- NRCCThe National Republican Congressional Committee, the House Republicans' official campaign organization.$1.8 million
- WOMEN SPEAK OUT PAC$74,000
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $4.6 million | $971,000 21% | $263 | FEC |
| 2024 | $3.7 million | $941,000 25% | $135,000 | FEC |
| 2022 | $2.8 million | $362,000 13% | $5.1 million | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.