Back to the library

Funding profile

Ed Case

Democrat · Representative for Hawaii’s 1st district

Career totals · 9 elections · 20022026

$6.3 million

raised by Case’s campaigns, everything from 2002 to 2026 added together.

38%

of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $2.4 million from PACs.

$6,419

was spent about Case by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.

Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Case on FEC.gov

Where the money came from

Everything Case’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.

$6.3 millionraised
  • Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.58%$3.7 million
  • Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.38%$2.4 million
  • Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.4%$262,000
Federal Election Commission filings across 9 elections. Percentages may not total 100 because each is rounded.

Who gave the most

Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.

  • Corporation49%$465,000
  • Trade association21%$204,000
  • Labor union14%$134,000
  • Membership organization7%$69,000
  • Co-operative1%$6,000
  • Corporation without capital stock<1%$1,000
  • Unclassified8%$77,000

Which industries

  • Defense & aerospace52% · $93,000
  • Retail & consumer20% · $35,000
  • Agriculture & food10% · $19,000
  • Technology & telecoms8% · $15,000
  • Other9% · $17,000

The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.

Largest committee givers

  1. 1General Dynamics CorporationDefense & aerospace · CorporationThe defense contractor's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$20,000
  2. 2The Home Depot Inc.Retail & consumer · CorporationThe home-improvement retailer's PAC, funded by employee contributions rather than company money.$20,000
  3. 3Chugach Alaska CorporationDefense & aerospace · Corporation$20,000
  4. 4Lockheed Martin CorporationDefense & aerospace · CorporationThe defense contractor's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$19,000
  5. 5Across the Aisle PACOther · Unclassified$19,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
  1. 6Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of AmericaAgriculture & food · Trade association$19,000
  2. 7General AtomicsDefense & aerospace · Corporation$18,000
  3. 8American Hotel and Lodging Association Political Action Committee ('hotelpac')Other · Trade association$17,000
  4. 9The Boeing CompanyDefense & aerospace · Corporation$16,000
  5. 10Motorola Solutions, Inc.Technology & telecoms · Corporation$15,000

“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.

Their money and their votes, side by side

For each industry that gave to Case: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.

This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Case voted; the judgment is yours.

Defense & aerospace$67,000 given

Case voted on 21 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 980On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedModernizing the Veterans On-Campus Experience Act of 2025 This bill removes the requirement that educational and vocational counseling services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on campus at institutions of higher learning must be provided by VA counselors.Yes
  • H R 3123On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill establishes procedures for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to issue a pension that was due but unpaid at the time of a veteran’s death.Yes
  • H R 695On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedMedal of Honor Act This act increases the monthly special pension for living Medal of Honor recipients.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 586On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedVietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to conduct an epidemiological study and report on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer) in veterans who served in the Vietnam theater of operations during the Vietnam era.Yes
  • H R 1039On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedClear Communication for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess notices that the VA sends to claimants applying for or submitting claims for VA benefits.Yes
  • H R 1228On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassPrioritizing Veterans' Survivors Act This bill provides that the Office of Survivors Assistance (OSA) must operate within the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (Currently, OSA operates within the Pension and Fiduciary Service of the Veterans Benefits Administration.)Yes
  • H R 530On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedACES Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study and report on the prevalence and mortality of cancers among veterans who served on active duty as aircrew members and regularly flew in fixed-wing aircraft.Yes
  • H R 1286On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedSimplifying Forms for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess the forms that the VA sends to claimants.Yes

Agriculture & food$19,000 given

Case voted on 8 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 2683On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill broadens the scope of the U.S. export control system to include remote access of items.Yes
  • H R 6500On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill extends through December 31, 2028, trade preferences that provide duty-free access to the U.S. market for most exports from eligible countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).Yes
  • H R 6504On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill extends through December 31, 2028, the special duty-free rules for various apparel products imported from Haiti, including the duty-free treatment provided for a limited amount (referred to as tariff preference levels) of certain apparel products assembled in and imported from Haiti.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 1326On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassDOE and USDA Interagency Research Act This bill requires the Department of Energy and Department of Agriculture to carry out cross-cutting and collaborative research and development activities through the establishment of an interagency agreement.Yes
  • H R 1011On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill revises the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) and the Emergency Forest Restoration Program (EFRP) to expand eligibility for payments to agricultural producers and owners of forest land impacted by natural disasters.Yes
  • H R 7567On PassageThis bill (commonly known as the farm bill) reauthorizes through FY2031 and modifies Department of Agriculture programs that address commodity support, conservation, trade and international food aid, nutrition assistance, farm credit, rural development, research and extension activities, forestry,…No
  • H R 2071On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill prohibits federal funds from being made available to international financial institutions (e.g., the International Monetary Fund) for financing activities related to foreign shrimp farms.Yes
  • S 629On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis act revises the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) and the Emergency Forest Restoration Program (EFRP) to expand eligibility for payments to agricultural producers and owners of forest land impacted by natural disasters.Yes

Technology & telecoms$15,000 given

Case voted on 12 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.

  • H R 901On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassResearch Security and Accountability in DHS Act This bill requires the Science and Technology Directorate in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to develop a department-wide policy for safeguarding research and development from unauthorized access or disclosures of sensitive information in related acquisitions.Yes
  • H R 1534On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassInnovative Mitigation Partnerships for Asphalt and Concrete Technologies Act or the IMPACT Act This bill requires the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish a temporary program that supports advanced production of low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt.Yes
  • S 146On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Passor the TAKE IT DOWN Act This act generally prohibits the nonconsensual online publication of intimate visual depictions of individuals, both authentic and computer-generated, and requires certain online platforms (e.g., social media platforms) to promptly remove such depictions upon receiving notice of their existence.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
  • H R 1681On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill establishes an interagency strike force to support federal land management agencies' review of requests for communications use authorizations. (A communications use authorization is required to modify or locate communications facilities on public lands.) The strike force must (1) conduct periodic calls with strike force members to ensure that each agency prioritizes the review of requests for communications use authorizations, (2) establish goals for the review of the requests, and (3) monitor and facilitate agency accountability for meeting the established goals.Yes
  • H R 5200On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate and report on emergency communications outages (e.g., 9-1-1 outages).Yes
  • H R 5201On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish a report on the enforcement of Kari’s Law, which requires multiline telephone systems to be preconfigured to allow users to dial 9-1-1 directly from any phone without dialing any additional code or prefix.Yes
  • H R 1223On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassAccelerating Networking, Cyberinfrastructure, and Hardware for Oceanic Research Act or the ANCHOR Act This bill requires the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop a plan to improve the cybersecurity and telecommunications capabilities of the U.S. Academic Research Fleet (ARF). ARF is comprised of U.S.-flagged vessels that provide at-sea laboratories where oceanographic scientists, educators, and students research and learn about marine science.Yes
  • S 1003On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassThis act requires the Federal Communications Commission to issue an order explicitly permitting the transmission of wireless emergency alerts to mobile phones in the event of a shark attack. (Under current regulations, authorized government authorities are permitted to send wireless emergency…Yes

We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.

Money spent about this member

Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Case has no legal control over any of it.

This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Case. It was spent on advertising about Case, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.

$6,419

has been spent for or against Case by outside groups. $6,419 supported Case; $0 opposed Case.

Largest outside spenders

Summed across 4 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.

Spent supporting

$6,419

Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.

  • DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HAWAII$4,894
  • TOGETHER WE THRIVE$750
  • ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND$686
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES$69
Show all 6 groupsShow fewer
  • SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION$10
  • SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE$10

Spent opposing

$0

Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.

Nothing on file.

Election by election

The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.

ElectionRaisedFrom PACsOutside spending
2026in progress$1.1 million$523,000 48%none
2024$700,000$547,000 78%$1,061
2022$1.1 million$563,000 53%$695
2020$606,000$404,000 67%$4,653
2018$564,000$74,000 13%none
2010$851,000$19,000 2%$10
2006$367,000$74,000 20%none
2004$755,000$162,000 21%none
2002$297,000$9,000 3%none

Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.

We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.