
Funding profile
Donald Norcross
Democrat · Representative for New Jersey’s 1st district
Career totals · 7 elections · 2014–2026
$15 million
raised by Norcross’s campaigns, everything from 2014 to 2026 added together.
47%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $7 million from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$1 million
was spent about Norcross by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Norcross on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Norcross’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.51%$7.6 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.45%$6.7 million
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.4%$607,000
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Norcross, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$235,000
reached Norcross this way, 3% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- AIPACThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$226,000
- NORPACA New Jersey-based pro-Israel PAC that bundles member donations for candidates of both parties.$9,000
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation38%$724,000
- Trade association15%$296,000
- Labor union31%$600,000
- Membership organization8%$163,000
- Co-operative1%$20,000
- Corporation without capital stock2%$43,000
- Unclassified4%$76,000
Which industries
- Defense & aerospace66% · $82,000
- Real estate & construction18% · $23,000
- Insurance16% · $20,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action CommitteeThe American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political arm. It backs candidates of both parties it considers strong supporters of the U.S.-Israel relationship.$27,000
- 2National Electrical Contractors Association$23,000
- 3Honeywell International Inc.The industrial and aerospace company's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$22,000
- 4Prudential Financial, Inc.$20,000
- 5The Boeing CompanyThe aerospace and defense company's PAC, funded by employee contributions.$20,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Transport Workers Union of America$20,000
- 7National Education Association$20,000
- 8International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers$20,000
- 9RTX Corporation$20,000
- 10Int'l Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers$20,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Their money and their votes, side by side
For each industry that gave to Norcross: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.
This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Norcross voted; the judgment is yours.
Defense & aerospace—$80,000 given
Norcross voted on 21 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 980On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedModernizing the Veterans On-Campus Experience Act of 2025 This bill removes the requirement that educational and vocational counseling services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on campus at institutions of higher learning must be provided by VA counselors.Yes
- H R 3123On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill establishes procedures for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to issue a pension that was due but unpaid at the time of a veteran’s death.Yes
- H R 695On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedMedal of Honor Act This act increases the monthly special pension for living Medal of Honor recipients.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 586On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedVietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to conduct an epidemiological study and report on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma (bile duct cancer) in veterans who served in the Vietnam theater of operations during the Vietnam era.No vote
- H R 1039On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedClear Communication for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess notices that the VA sends to claimants applying for or submitting claims for VA benefits.No vote
- H R 1228On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassPrioritizing Veterans' Survivors Act This bill provides that the Office of Survivors Assistance (OSA) must operate within the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (Currently, OSA operates within the Pension and Fiduciary Service of the Veterans Benefits Administration.)No vote
- H R 530On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedACES Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study and report on the prevalence and mortality of cancers among veterans who served on active duty as aircrew members and regularly flew in fixed-wing aircraft.No vote
- H R 1286On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedSimplifying Forms for Veterans Claims Act This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to seek to enter an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to assess the forms that the VA sends to claimants.No vote
Insurance—$20,000 given
Norcross voted on 19 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 736On Motion to Suspend the Rules and PassProtect Small Businesses from Excessive Paperwork Act of 2025 This bill extends the deadline for certain companies that are required to file beneficial ownership information with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).Yes
- S J RES 28On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) titled Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications and published on December 10, 2024.No vote
- S J RES 18On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau titled Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions and published on December 30, 2024.No vote
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- S J RES 13On PassageThis joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency titled Business Combinations Under the Bank Merger Act and published on September 25, 2024.No vote
- H R 3394On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedFair Investment Opportunities for Professional Experts Act This bill expands the eligibility criteria for an accredited investor for purposes of participating in private offerings of securities to include an individual determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to have qualifying professional knowledge through educational or professional experience. (Certain unregistered securities may only be offered to accredited investors.) The bill also provides statutory authority for certain existing criteria for an accredited investor, including licensure or registration in good standing as a broker or investment adviser, specified annual salary, and specified net worth.Yes
- H R 3234On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill increases the amount insured depository institutions may accept as reciprocal deposits. (Reciprocal deposits are used by institutions to increase the availability of deposit insurance by splitting large deposits using a reciprocal network of institutions.) The bill creates a tiered system so that the allowable amount is based on the institution's total liabilities.Yes
- H R 4544On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill requires federal financial regulators to review and streamline the application process for the formation of de novo, or new, depository institutions or credit unions.Yes
- H R 5317On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill changes the treatment of certain types of deposits so they are no longer classified as brokered deposits.Yes
Labor—$20,000 given
Norcross voted on 7 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 2262On PassageThis bill modifies the definition of hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act to exclude certain voluntary training that occurs outside an employee's regular working hours.No
- H R 2988On PassageProtecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act This bill modifies the requirements for fiduciaries of employer-sponsored retirement plans.No vote
- H R 1156On PassagePandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act This bill extends from 5 to 10 years the statute of limitations for federal criminal charges or civil enforcement actions for fraud related to several unemployment insurance programs that were established during the COVID-19 pandemic.No vote
Show 4 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 5408On PassageThis bill establishes mandatory deadlines for parties negotiating an initial collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and provides for mediation and arbitration to finalize CBAs. Under the bill, CBA negotiations must begin within 10 days after an employer receives a written request from a newly recognized or certified bargaining representative.Yes
- H R 2550On PassageThis bill nullifies the Executive Order titled Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs (issued on March 27, 2025), which excludes specified executive agencies and subdivisions from the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.Yes
- H R 2270On Motion to RecommitThis bill excludes the value of employer-funded child or dependent care from being used in calculating an eligible employee's overtime pay.Yes
- H R 2312On Motion to RecommitThis bill modifies the definition of a tipped employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to exclude consideration of an employee's duties when determining if the employee is a tipped employee.Yes
We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Norcross has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Norcross. It was spent on advertising about Norcross, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$1 million
has been spent for or against Norcross by outside groups. $1 million supported Norcross; $0 opposed Norcross.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 7 elections, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$1 millionAds urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- HOUSE MAJORITY PACA super PAC aligned with House Democratic leadership, spending to win or hold Democratic House seats.$816,000
- PATRIOT MAJORITY USA$215,000
- HEROES UNITED PAC, DBA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, DBA ASSOCIATION OF POLICE & FIRST RESPONDERS$5,700
- DMFI PAC$2,500
Show all 8 groupsShow fewer
- INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 98 COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION$1,901
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES$105
- NEA ADVOCACY FUND$68
- SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION$40
Spent opposing
$0Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
Nothing on file.
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $1.7 million | $791,000 48% | $10 | FEC |
| 2024 | $2.2 million | $1.1 million 50% | $2,510 | FEC |
| 2022 | $2.2 million | $1.1 million 51% | $19 | FEC |
| 2020 | $2.2 million | $1.1 million 49% | $5,770 | FEC |
| 2018 | $2.2 million | $991,000 45% | $114 | FEC |
| 2016 | $2.4 million | $880,000 36% | $217,000 | FEC |
| 2014 | $2.1 million | $780,000 37% | $816,000 | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.