Funding profile
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen
Republican · Delegate for American Samoa
Career totals · 16 elections · 1994–2026
$816,000
raised by Radewagen’s campaigns, everything from 1994 to 2026 added together.
20%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $163,000 from PACs.
$265
was spent about Radewagen by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Radewagen on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Radewagen’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.71%$579,000
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.20%$163,000
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.9%$75,000
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Unclassified100%$53,000
Largest committee givers
- 1Emmer Victory Committee$10,000
- 2Commander Zinke$7,500
- 3Scalise Leadership Fund$7,000
- 4Steptoe LLP Political Action Committee$5,000
- 5American Revival PAC$5,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Land of Opportunity PAC$4,000
- 7Buckeye Victory Fund$4,000
- 8Maggie's List$3,100
- 9Johnson Leadership Fund$2,000
- 10Pfluger Victory Fund$1,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Radewagen has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Radewagen. It was spent on advertising about Radewagen, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$265
has been spent for or against Radewagen by outside groups. $265 supported Radewagen; $0 opposed Radewagen.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 1 election, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$265Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- AMERICAN VETERANS SUPPORT GROUP PAC$265
Spent opposing
$0Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
Nothing on file.
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $39,000 | $18,000 45% | none | FEC |
| 2024 | $65,000 | $26,000 39% | none | FEC |
| 2022 | $57,000 | $30,000 52% | $265 | FEC |
| 2020 | $76,000 | $21,000 28% | none | FEC |
| 2018 | $167,000 | $36,000 21% | none | FEC |
| 2016 | $78,000 | $13,000 17% | none | FEC |
| 2014 | $25,000 | $0 0% | none | FEC |
| 2012 | $19,000 | $5,000 26% | none | FEC |
| 2010 | $50,000 | $0 0% | none | FEC |
| 2008 | $101,000 | $3,750 4% | none | FEC |
| 2006 | $14,000 | $1,000 7% | none | FEC |
| 2004 | $41,000 | $2,500 6% | none | FEC |
| 2002 | $15,000 | $250 2% | none | FEC |
| 2000 | $31,000 | $5,500 18% | none | FEC |
| 1996 | $19,000 | $0 0% | none | FEC |
| 1994 | $18,000 | $1,454 8% | none | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.