Funding profile
Adelita S. Grijalva
Democrat · Representative for Arizona’s 7th district
Career totals · 1 election · 2026–2026
$2.3 million
raised by Grijalva’s campaigns, everything from the 2026 election added together.
19%
of it came from organized groups rather than from people giving on their own: at least $442,000 from PACs, plus donations that organizations collected and directed.
$419,000
was spent about Grijalva by outside groups. These are ads for or against them that their campaign cannot control, and none of it is part of the money above.
Every number on this page comes from Federal Election Commission filings, read on August 24, 2026. An election still under way keeps raising money, so its figure will have grown since. Check Grijalva on FEC.gov
Where the money came from
Everything Grijalva’s campaigns have reported raising, split by who gave it.
- Individual donorsMoney given by people, in their own name.81%$1.8 million
- Political action committeesOrganized groups: company-run committees, unions, trade associations.19%$436,000
- Other sourcesParty transfers, the candidate's own money, loans and smaller categories.<1%$8,328
Money bundled through organizations
Not every “individual” donation arrives on its own. An organization can collect checks from its members, already earmarked for Grijalva, and deliver them in a bundle. The law counts that as individual money, but the organization still chose where it went.
$6,550
reached Grijalva this way, <1% of everything they raised from individuals. Each donation came from a real person. The organization picked who got it.
- EMILY's ListA group that works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights, and one of the oldest donation bundlers in politics.$6,550
We can only count the organizations we have measured, so the real figure could be higher than this, never lower. Bundling is legal and widely used, and appearing here is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Who gave the most
Committee contributions from the 2024 and 2026 election periods, grouped by how the FEC classifies each giver. This covers a slice of the career total, and giving to a campaign is legal and ordinary.
- Corporation<1%$2,000
- Trade association4%$16,000
- Labor union38%$166,000
- Membership organization7%$32,000
- Unclassified50%$219,000
Which industries
- Banking & finance100% · $13,000
The FEC records that a committee is a corporation; it does not record its industry. Those labels are ours, kept in a published list anyone can check. Where we have not labeled a giver we say “Other” rather than guessing.
Largest committee givers
- 1United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Active Ballot Club$20,000
- 2International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$15,000
- 3International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers$15,000
- 4International Association of Fire Fighters$14,000
- 5Credit Union National Association, Inc.The trade association for credit unions.$13,000
Show all 10 giversShow fewer
- 6Democrats Win Fund Action$12,000
- 7Turquoise PAC$10,000
- 8Unite Here$10,000
- 9Juntos PAC$10,000
- 10Chc Bold PAC$10,000
“Unclassified” means the FEC records no organization type for that committee, which usually means a leadership PAC. We show it as unclassified rather than guessing which industry it belongs to.
Their money and their votes, side by side
For each industry that gave to Grijalva: the money, then the bills they voted on in that industry’s area of law. The Library of Congress assigns each bill’s subject, not us, so nothing here is picked to make a point.
This is not evidence that money bought a vote. People often donate to politicians who already agree with them. We show what was given and how Grijalva voted; the judgment is yours.
Banking & finance—$10,000 given
Grijalva voted on 11 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 7959On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill modifies provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to whistleblower awards and protections.Yes
- H R 3234On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill increases the amount insured depository institutions may accept as reciprocal deposits.Yes
- H R 4544On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill requires federal financial regulators to review and streamline the application process for the formation of de novo, or new, depository institutions or credit unions.Yes
Show 5 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 5317On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill changes the treatment of certain types of deposits so they are no longer classified as brokered deposits.No
- H R 1993On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill directs the Department of the Treasury to mint and issue coins to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and the establishment of the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center.Yes
- H R 2478On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill establishes procedures for delaying the redemption of certain securities if an investment company or agent believes that an older individual or an individual with certain impairments has been financially exploited.Yes
- H R 7128On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedThis bill reauthorizes the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program through 2034.Yes
- H R 1181On PassageThis bill prohibits payment card networks from using merchant codes that distinguish firearms retailers from general-merchandise retailers or sporting-goods retailers.No
Labor—$9,000 given
Grijalva voted on 6 bills in this area. The 3 most substantive are listed first.
- H R 2262On PassageThis bill modifies the definition of hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act to exclude certain voluntary training that occurs outside an employee's regular working hours.No
- H R 2988On PassageProtecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act This bill modifies the requirements for fiduciaries of employer-sponsored retirement plans.No
- H R 5408On PassageThis bill establishes mandatory deadlines for parties negotiating an initial collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and provides for mediation and arbitration to finalize CBAs.Yes
Show 3 more bills with full summariesShow fewer
- H R 2550On PassageThis bill nullifies the Executive Order titled Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs (issued on March 27, 2025), which excludes specified executive agencies and subdivisions from the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.Yes
- H R 2270On Motion to RecommitThis bill excludes the value of employer-funded child or dependent care from being used in calculating an eligible employee's overtime pay.Yes
- H R 2312On Motion to RecommitThis bill modifies the definition of a tipped employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to exclude consideration of an employee's duties when determining if the employee is a tipped employee.Yes
We do not score these or say which way a vote favored an industry, because that would be our opinion dressed up as a finding. Each bill links to the chamber’s own roll-call record. Industries where fewer than three bills came to a vote are left out, because a handful of votes cannot show a pattern.
Money spent about this member
Outside groups, usually super PACs, may spend without limit on ads for or against a candidate, as long as they do not coordinate with the campaign. Grijalva has no legal control over any of it.
This is not a donation. Nobody gave this money to Grijalva. It was spent on advertising about Grijalva, and money spent against a candidate is plainly not funding them. So it never gets added to the figures above.
$419,000
has been spent for or against Grijalva by outside groups. $385,000 supported Grijalva; $33,000 opposed Grijalva.
Largest outside spenders
Summed across 1 election, using the Commission's aggregated totals so amended filings and 24-hour notices are not double-counted.
Spent supporting
$385,000Ads urging people to vote for this member. Still not their money, and they cannot direct how it is spent.
- WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC$134,000
- PROGRESSIVE PROMISE$95,000
- CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC$80,000
- LCV VICTORY FUND$60,000
Show all 7 groupsShow fewer
- VOTE NURSES VALUES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION$10,000
- VOTAR ES PODER PAC$6,015
- GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTIONA donation platform run by the League of Conservation Voters and NRDC Action Votes that directs money to candidates it rates strong on climate policy.$240
Spent opposing
$33,000Ads urging people to vote against this member. This money was spent to defeat them.
- TUCSON FAMILIES FED UP PAC$33,000
Election by election
The career figures above are the sum of these elections. Each row links to the Commission’s page for that election, where the numbers match line for line.
| Election | Raised | From PACs | Outside spending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026in progress | $2.3 million | $436,000 19% | $419,000 | FEC |
Raised is everything the campaign took in for that election. From PACs is the slice of it given by political action committees. Outside spending is what other groups spent on ads about the race, for and against—it is not part of “Raised”. An election marked in progress is still raising money, so its figures are not final.
We never publish the names of individual donors, and anything we cannot source stays off the page. The methodology explains every such choice.